Clinical Evidence
Echo AI EACVI 2026 · Congress Abstract

AI-Based Automated Echocardiographic Analysis: Validation Against Manual Echocardiography and CMR in Ischemic, Hypertrophic, and Amyloid Cardiomyopathies

r=0.95
EDV Correlation
vs manual echo
r=0.88
LVEDV vs CMR
Higher than manual echo (r=0.85)
145
Patients
ICM · HCM · Cardiac Amyloidosis
3
Cardiomyopathies
No subgroup inferior on Steiger's test

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) plays a key role in the assessment of cardiomyopathy but remains time-consuming and highly dependent on operator expertise. AI-based automated echocardiographic analysis may improve efficiency and measurement reproducibility; however, validation against cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with cardiomyopathy remains limited.

To validate an AI-based automated echocardiography algorithm (AI-Echo) against expert manual echocardiography and CMR in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), or cardiac amyloidosis (CA).

This single-center retrospective study included 145 patients with ICM (n=49), HCM (n=48), or CA (n=48) who underwent TTE and CMR within one month between August 2013 and November 2025. AI-Echo was compared with expert echocardiography and CMR for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), LV mass, interventricular septal thickness at end-diastole (IVSd), and left atrial diameter (LAD) measurements. Agreement was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and mean absolute error (MAE), with Bland–Altman plots. Correlations were compared using Steiger's Z-test.

AI-Echo showed strong agreement with manual echocardiography across all measured parameters:

Parameter AI-Echo Manual Echo r (vs Manual) MAE
LVEF (%) 47.79 ± 13.07 51.62 ± 15.27 0.81 7.84
EDV (mL) 106.49 ± 48.42 118.40 ± 52.21 0.95 15.46
ESV (mL) 59.13 ± 39.19 62.22 ± 43.78 0.94 11.03
LV Mass (g) 208.36 ± 58.96 222.52 ± 70.42 0.82 31.89
IVSd (mm) 12.52 ± 3.29 12.88 ± 3.88 0.80 1.81
LAD (mm) 40.73 ± 6.83 45.10 ± 7.20 0.81 4.97

Compared with CMR, AI-Echo showed correlations comparable to manual echocardiography for LVEF (r=0.86 vs 0.87), IVSd (r=0.81 vs 0.79), and LAD (r=0.77 vs 0.72; all p≥0.05). For volumetric parameters, AI-Echo demonstrated higher correlation with CMR than manual echo: LVEDV (r=0.88 vs 0.85), LVESV (r=0.95 vs 0.93), and LV mass (r=0.80 vs 0.74; all p<0.05). Across all three cardiomyopathy subgroups, AI-Echo correlations with CMR ranged from r=0.65–0.90, with no subgroup showing inferiority to manual echo on Steiger's test (all p≥0.05).

In patients with ICM, HCM and cardiac amyloidosis, AI-Echo produced measurements in strong agreement with expert manual echocardiography and showed similar or higher agreement with CMR. These findings support AI-Echo as an efficient and validated approach for quantitative assessment of cardiac structure and function in cardiomyopathy.

Request the Full Evidence Package

Access full study materials, regulatory submission summaries, and our complete publication list.

Request Evidence Package